February 2007 Archives

Reader's Block by David Markson

Reader's Block is a "different" kind of book, even more of an anti-novel then Wittgenstein's Mistress which I read for an MFA class last year (though apprarently still more of a novel than This is Not a Novel which I haven't read).

Wittgenstein's Mistress was about the last person in the world, who, overwhelmed with lonliness and insanity, rambled away into a typewriter about every fact she could muster and every thought she had, thoughts and facts which tended to focus on artists and writers and their untimely ends. In Reader's Block we still have the rambling facts, but we've lost the grounding of a real narrator. Instead there are one sentence mentions of "Reader" and "Protagonist" popping up about once every couple of pages, painting us just the barest of ideas that the "Protagonist" is a lonely old man and the "Reader" is, well, just as lonely. The facts focus primarily on various how artists died or committed suicide and which artists were anti-semites.

It's surprisingly an easy book to read, since there are only about 10 lines per page, so despite its density of (puportedly) non-fictional content, I zoomed through it. And despite its lacking of a real narrative I found the whole thing immensely sad. Even though you only get a few moments of "Protagonist," I felt like this whole book was his suicide note, his expression of grief over his lonliness and the world's cruelty to and by its artists.

Someone told me (and I have no way to back this up) that when Markson fills his books with thousands of trivia details about artists and the world that he doesn't actually look any of them up. Rather, he has spent his life jotting down these facts on index cards and that in his house he has thousands and thousands of index cards from which he pulls out these facts while writing. Pretty amazing if true.

I know I've ranted about the media treatment of Apple before, so I'll try to be brief. Plus since I haven't been inspired to post much lately I'm willing to jot down anything, even if it's annoying and boring.

The following news item caught my attention: Cisco, Apple settle over right to iPhone name.

I'm fine with that. I'm glad the two companies could come to some agreement that will hopefully be beneficial to consumers and each other. My shock is how the media and legal analysts seem to agree with Steve Jobs' point of view that the whole lawsuit was "silly" and are saying that the "there's little likelihood of future trademark tangles."

Are you kidding me? Two phones called the iPhone? Yes, one is using VoIP and one uses the cellular network, but how could anyone possibly imagine that these are not playing in - at the very least - a closely related space, if not the same space. To say that "Cisco's argument that the phones could eventually compete [seems] like an unlikely scenario" is not only short-sighted but a willful denial of everything we know about how business and technologies grow. Even if they never become direct competition to each other OF COURSE a second widely-advertised phone called the iPhone is going to confuse customers looking at Cisco's same-named product, which is just what trademarks are meant to prevent.

But, no, according to the article, legal analysts say things like "there's probably room for them to find peaceful cooperation," and "the combination of the two is obviously more powerful than the two butting heads." Which is all obviously a finger-shaking towards Cisco, since they are the one bringing a lawsuit and "butting heads" rather than trying to play nice.

Here's where your imagination needs to come in. Let's imagine for a moment that MICROSOFT released a new product called the iPhone without first obtaining permission for a name that had been in use by another technology company for the last seven years. Do you think the press and legal analysts would consider it "silly" for the other tech company to be upset? Do you think they'd take Microsoft's side?

SVC

| 3 Comments

The Real Literary Genetics

| 2 Comments

Today's comic is a bit wordy... Get it? Wordy? Ha ha ha!

American Shaolin by Matthew Polly

I normally avoid cross-posting between my blog and my "book track" because who the hell cares what books I read? (Also, who the hell cares what I post on my blog? But since this is something I'm posting on my blog, it would be insincere of me to pursue that question further at this time.) I'm going to break protocol and direct you to read about (and buy!) the new memoir American Shaolin by Matthew Polly.

Find my book track notes here.
Find the Amazon page here.

American Shaolin by Matthew Polly

Matt is a poker buddy of mine, but that doesn't change the fact that his book is excellent. It's interesting how you can know vague facts about your pal spending some time learning Kung Fu in China but not realize that he was essentially blazing a strange kind of trail for America/China relations. I don't read a ton of non-fiction and even less memoirs, but this read like a novel and (sorry for this, but it's true) I couldn't put it down.

Here's the text of my review on Amazon (it's important to post on Amazon to help pimp your friends' books):

"I just finished reading American Shaolin and it really is a fantastic book! I haven't been that engrossed in a book for a while (I missed my subway stop two different times while reading it). It is exciting, funny, and moving. Plus quite amazing - I could hardly believe some of the stories and I kept putting down the book to tell my girlfriend about them. Also, it's excellently written. This is not just a retelling of interesting stories; the book really respects the subject matter, putting the people at a higher level of importance then the events, and lets the reader find a lot of meaning and depth.

You don't have to be interested in (or know anything about) the martial arts to enjoy this book. You just have to be interested in reading about someone who goes on an unbelievable journey to learn about himself, find his limits and his potential, and discover how an ancient tradition has become part of the modern world."

The best part is that I'm being honest. I would have said good things about the book no matter what (at least I would have on Amazon, maybe not here) but it's even better when I can say it and mean it.

About this Archive

This page is an archive of entries from February 2007 listed from newest to oldest.

January 2007 is the previous archive.

March 2007 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.