There's this new comic strip called "Prickly City" which is intended to provide a conservative "rebuttal to the likes of Doonesbury and The Boondocks". As far as syndicated comic strips go it is mildy decent though mostly uninteresting, which describes about 49% of comic strips (50% being treacly flapdoodle, and the remaining 1% being okay.) I have no issue with a conservative themed comic strip (though "Prickly City" does seem like it is trying a little too hard to stick to the party line). My concern is that the comic's main conservative viewpoint is espoused by a young African American girl, while the author is most definitely white. I have no problem with a white cartoonist penning a black character, but it seems a little bit disingenuous for Scott Stantis to push an agenda in this way. Am I being overly sensitive? Perhaps most comics in the 'liberal media' are pushing liberal agendas in the same manner. I suppose Berkeley Breathed, author of "Bloom County", used an impoverished African American girl to preach what can only be called an extreme liberal viewpoint (they lived in a commune, for goodness sakes). Yet for some reason this seems different to me.
Conservative Cartooning
Categories:
1 Comment
Monthly Archives
- June 2010 (12)
- May 2010 (5)
- April 2010 (3)
- March 2010 (1)
- February 2010 (2)
- January 2010 (3)
- December 2009 (2)
- November 2009 (2)
- October 2009 (3)
- September 2009 (3)
- August 2009 (3)
- July 2009 (1)
- June 2009 (2)
- May 2009 (2)
- April 2009 (3)
- March 2009 (4)
- February 2009 (1)
- January 2009 (5)
- December 2008 (2)
- November 2008 (1)
- October 2008 (3)
- September 2008 (5)
- August 2008 (3)
- July 2008 (4)
- June 2008 (5)
- May 2008 (1)
- April 2008 (3)
- March 2008 (8)
- February 2008 (9)
- January 2008 (9)
- December 2007 (8)
- November 2007 (3)
- October 2007 (6)
- September 2007 (3)
- July 2007 (6)
- May 2007 (4)
- April 2007 (8)
- March 2007 (16)
- February 2007 (6)
- January 2007 (12)
- December 2006 (6)
- November 2006 (3)
- October 2006 (6)
- September 2006 (8)
- August 2006 (13)
- July 2006 (6)
- June 2006 (7)
- May 2006 (5)
- April 2006 (5)
- March 2006 (4)
- February 2006 (5)
- January 2006 (9)
- December 2005 (10)
- November 2005 (7)
- October 2005 (8)
- September 2005 (5)
- August 2005 (11)
- July 2005 (8)
- June 2005 (19)
- May 2005 (10)
- April 2005 (18)
- March 2005 (10)
- February 2005 (14)
- January 2005 (14)
- December 2004 (11)
- November 2004 (7)
- October 2004 (13)
- September 2004 (18)
- August 2004 (20)
- July 2004 (11)
- June 2004 (16)
- May 2004 (23)
Pages
Search
About this Entry
This page contains a single entry by MixedMetaphors.net published on August 16, 2004 2:49 PM.
Things I Appreciate But My Girlfriend Not Only Doesn't Appreciate But Actually Dislikes So Much That I Have Been Banned From Even Attempting To Do These Things Ever Again was the previous entry in this blog.
Mmmmm! is the next entry in this blog.
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Argh. I've got to stop reading this stupid comic strip. I keep checking on it just to see how inanely partisan it can be, and then I get upset when it is inanely partisan. I couldn't care less that it isn't funny. A lot of comics aren't funny and I don't get upset about it. But it's something else that really irks me. For example, the Aug 23 strip shows the protagonist coyote talking to John Edwards, but then John Edwards runs the coyote over in an attempt to "chase an ambulance", before John Edwards remembers he is no longer an "ambulance chaser", but, rather, a vice presidential candidate. It's so stupid. But why does it enrage me so? Maybe it's because the strip is trying so hard to make anti-Democrat jokes instead of being a comic strip that makes jokes which happen to be anti-Democrat. It's a small difference, but it's there.
Now that I think about it, I also get annoyed by the cloyingly liberal comic strips such as "This Modern World" and the other partisan nonsense found in local arts & entertainment journals. So I guess my real problem is when partisan humor, no matter the bias, attempts to make a "joke" by pointing out how stupid/evil/wrong the other side is, but is really making obviously inacurate leaps of logic that the author takes as a given. And I hate obviously inacurate leaps of logic that authors take as given.